A Clipper By Any Other Name PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bill Cox   

If you’re considering a bare-minimum, entry-level airplane, it’s tough to beat the high wing Pipers of the late ‘40s. It seems everyone and his brother was offering a bare bones, entry-level airplane following the war – Globe, Luscombe, Aeronca, Porterfield, Taylorcraft, Ercoupe Cessna – but with the legacy of the Cub as a reference, Piper’s various models came highly recommended.

From 1945 thru the early 1950s, you have your choice of a variety of two-to-three passenger taildraggers, typically for less than $20,000. Most of these airplanes are capable of cruising at 70-85 knots with a reasonable load, and they’re among the most economical airplanes to operate.

Virtually all those models were derived in one form or another from the basic J-3 Cub, updated and renamed the PA-11 Cub after the war. (For you trivia buffs, the original “J” designation was derived from Walter C. Jamouneau, Piper’s chief engineer in the ‘30s.)

J-3s were adapted to an amazing variety of configurations, including, would you believe, a biplane. Depending upon how you count them, there were nearly a dozen tailwheel models produced, from the basic PA-11 Cub to the PA-20 Pacer. They’re all economy champs, perfectly suited to the pilot who wishes to economize on purchase price and operating costs.

Gilbert Pierce of Germantown, Tennessee, is one of those pilots. First licensed in 1990, Pierce was de­termined to fly at minimum cost, though he didn’t start off with a high wing Piper.

“After I learned to fly, I almost immediately began building a Kitfox,” says Pierce. “I took three years to finish it, and it was a fun-flying little airplane. The problem was the ‘little’ part. For my purposes, the Kitfox was just too cramped and slow to be practical as a traveling machine.”

As a result, Gil and his wife, Barbara, went looking for a short-wing Piper. They found their airplane a year later – a bright red, PA-16 Clipper in the Pacific Northwest. The Pierce’s airplane is a 1949 model, the only year of Clipper production, though in name only. Pan American Airways objected to Piper’s use of the Clipper model name, insisting it had it copyrighted and that Piper should cease and desist.

Bill Piper reasoned the Clipper designation had been applied to sailing ships long before there were airplanes, much less airlines, but he felt the court battle wouldn’t be worth it. Accordingly, the 1950 model was renamed the Pacer.

Talk about minimalist design. Technically, the Clipper was a four-seat, 115 hp follow-on to the two-place, 65 hp Piper Vagabond, a variant of the Cub. It’s interesting that the Vagabond’s fuselage was stretched only 16 inches to accommodate the rear seat, so aft passengers needed to be little people or very short of leg. In an attempt to reduce drag and improve cruise performance, both the Clipper and Vagabond featured a wing six feet shorter in span, with three feet removed from the root on each side.

Piper’s Vagabond and Clipper were the first of what became known as the short-wing Pipers, consisting of the Vagabond, Clipper, Pacer, Colt and Tri-Pacer. These variants of the Cub spawned one of the most enthusiastic type organizations in America, strangely known as the Short Wing Piper Club.

Shortly after acquiring their Clipper, Gil and Barbara Pierce began a complete rebuild that was to require eight years of off-season work. “The renovation was a work in progress for us,” says Gil. “When airshow season was over and winter was setting in, we’d ground the airplane and start overhauling or rebuilding a major component, then reassemble everything for the flying season. We rebuilt and recovered one wing one year, the other wing the next, replaced the engine the following winter, totally redesigned and updated the instrument panel, recovered the fuselage the year after that and so on.

“In fact, we weren’t totally finished with the Clipper until a few weeks before Oshkosh 2004,” Pierce continues. “Barbara was an invaluable asset during the rebuild, especially on the recovering process. A knowledge of sewing was especially important. She worked even harder than I did on the airplane, and she’s just as proud of the result as I am.”

The Pierces also received valuable assistance from their sons, Stephan and Chris. More than coincidentally, Stephan owns an aircraft restoration and paint shop in Graham, Texas, and he assisted in virtually every aspect of the rebuilt of his Dad’s Clipper, appropriately named RED LADY.

Perhaps the most significant improvement was the new, larger engine. The Pierces upgraded power from the stock 115 hp Lycoming O-235 to the 150 hp Lycoming O-320. Son Stephan acquired a basket case O-320, and he and his father rebuilt the engine from the bottom up. Adding 85 cubic inches more displacement out front also necessitated an entirely new cowling, and again, Stephan came to the rescue with a redesigned cowl.

Such a major power increase with the same 1650-pound gross weight resulted in a dramatic improvement in takeoff and climb performance plus a notable speed-up at cruise. To more than offset the 36-pound weight increase with the larger engine and prop, Gil applied for and received a 150 pound gross weight increase to 1800 pounds, the same as the later Pacer’s all-up weight. “I was able to prove to the FAA’s satisfaction that there’s no real structural differences between the Clipper and Pacer,” says Gil, “and on that basis, they gave me a field approval to 1800 pounds.”

To provide adequate fuel for the larger engine, Gil increased capacity to 36 gallons with the addition of a Colt fuel tank in the right wing. Gil says he regularly flight plans for three-hour legs and usually has six to seven gallons of reserve remaining.

The finished airplane is about as perfect an example of a short wing Piper as you’ll find, and we’re not the only ones who think so. The Pierce’s Clipper won Grand Champion at the 2004 Short Wing Piper Convention in Sault St Marie, Michigan, and was awarded Outstanding Custom Classic Class B honors at the 2004 Oshkosh EAA AirVenture show.

So what’s it like to fly a prize-winner? Once you work your way past the intimidation factor of flying such a totally pristine machine, the Pierce family Clipper handles very much as you’d expect, only better. Everything works perfectly, and of course, with the big engine out front, performance is well ahead of book.

Gil and I flew out of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, immediately after the Oshkosh show, and he magnanimously put me straight into the left seat for the initial formation takeoff with our Skylane photo ship. Despite the Clipper’s tailwheel configuration (or arguably because of it), the airplane was a joy to fly during the power-up, takeoff roll and liftoff and it willingly stayed within 20 feet of the photo ship for the next hour.

Acceleration was impressive with 150 hp encouraging probably 1600 pounds of Clipper, journalist and proud owner. The light controls and copious power helped keep the PA-16 close to our lead airplane for the duration of the photo shoot, and the Skylane pilot was surprised how little she had to come back on power for us to stay with her.

Better still, though, was the way Gil’s Super Clipper flew when it was unleashed. “I didn’t really know what to expect from all the extra power,” Gil admits. “Even the Pacer never had more than 135 hp, and the Cub wouldn’t see 150 hp until 1966, so my airplane offered quite a power advantage that no original Piper of the time enjoyed.”

One minor inconvenience surfaced when Gil discovered the Clipper was flying so fast that air loads on the horizontal stabilizer made trimming the elevator difficult, because the trim cable would simply slip on the pulley. Gil and his son installed a new, double-groove pulley system out of a Tri-Pacer that provided more trim power and solved the problem. “That mod alone required seven field approvals from the FAA,” comments Gil.

Despite the Clipper’s additional power, the smaller wing kept the airplane from sharing the Cub’s phenomenal short field capability, but the PA-16’s runway requirements are nevertheless minimal, perhaps 700 feet for takeoff and a similar distance for landing. Once in the air, the additional power translates to dramatically better climb than the original airplane.

“The standard PA-16 never did much better than about 500 fpm,” says Gil, “but after we installed the new engine, I could count on at least 900 fpm, sometimes more. I’m certain the service ceiling improved as well but I don’t normally fly high enough to find out.”

Straight line performance escalated so dramatically that Gil was forced to install a climb prop to keep the speed down. “We were seeing about 90 knots at max cruise before the conversion,” he explains, “and the big engine drove the airspeed well up into the yellow, so I elected to go with a climb prop to keep cruise at about 105 knots. In other words, we picked up about 15 knots from the conversion.”

The first major trip with the new engine was to Anchorage, Alaska for the 2001 Short Wing Piper Convention. Gil was freshly retired and eager to break in the new engine, and the 3000 nm trip from Tennessee to Anchorage was a perfect opportunity. “We burned about 8.0 gph on that trip, so the Clipper yielded about 15 smpg, not bad considering we were traveling at double the speed of the cars below on the Alaskan Highway.”

As I discovered during my short flight, landing manners are fairly sedate, especially considering that this is a narrow-geared taildragger. Piper had no airplane that competed head-to-head with Cessna’s 170, but the Pierce’s modified Clipper is on par with the popular Cessna and lands equally easily. The Clipper uses a cord-gear suspension system that works remarkable well, provided you keep the approach speed to 60 knots or less.

Gil and Barbara are inveterate airshow fans who plan to campaign their Clipper around the country, especially at Sun ‘n Fun, AirVenture and the Short Wing Piper get-togethers. Now that they’re basically finished with the renovation, they’ll probably be looking for places to fly, and as their trip to Alaska suggests, they’re not afraid of long distances.

So if you’re flying to any of next year’s shows and see a sparkling red Piper Clipper flying faster than it has any right to, you can probably guess who’s at the controls.